Skip to content

Decision-support tool Trade-off

Beta

Quebec Energy Simulator (2025-2050)

Beta version 0.5.3

Current scenario:

Scenario result

Indicators for

First capacity shortfall

Energy balance in 2035

Rise in average cost by 2035

GHGs avoided in 2035

GHGs avoided outside Quebec in 2035

Energy balance

Reading this chart: colors, hatching, axis
  • Needs: needs without savings, Quebec plus exports. Everything in color must reach this line.
  • Energy savings, the “virtual power plant”: each TWh saved is a TWh that does not have to be generated. They stack on top of generation.
  • In gray, existing supply: hydro, existing wind, Labrador (1969 contract). In color, what is added.
  • Hatched blue: depends on the option chosen for Churchill Falls.
  • Hatched red: remaining needs to be met, through temporary imports or other solutions, as in Hydro-Québec’s supply balances.
  • Band under the years: gap between supply and needs, green for a surplus, rust for a shortfall.
  • Axis: TWh per year, one step per year. It starts at 100 TWh.

Your decisions

Start from a scenario

Adjust

Construction rates start after a commissioning delay. A decision taken today often takes effect 5 to 10 years later.

Conditions2 settingsThese are not decisions: water inflows and duration, to test weather and climate
Benchmarks and sources

Benchmarks: −42 TWh in 2023, −35 in 2024 and −33 in 2025 compared with normal (Hydro-Québec, 2025 financial results, in French). The annual model does not represent multi-year reservoirs, which absorb part of a dry spell: the effect of a short episode is probably overstated here. Since 1943, the reservoirs have received on average enough water to generate 222.4 TWh a year, and three years this low in a row had not been seen since 1961-1963 (État de l’énergie au Québec 2026, chart 13, p. 19, in French).

Assumptions and sources

Limitations of this version
  • Annual model: it represents neither hours, nor reservoirs, nor regions. An annual balance can hide real strains.
  • The average cost does not distinguish between customer classes. The cap applies here to all rates.
  • The third tier and the first per-person tier change bills without rebalancing Hydro-Québec’s revenues.
  • The cost of household equipment (heat pumps, vehicles) is not counted.
  • GHGs avoided outside Quebec are counted separately, never added to Quebec’s: exports minus purchases in a shortfall year, at the neighbors’ average intensity (Electricity Maps, 2025), assumed to decline through 2050. In practice, an export displaces backup generation, from gas, which emits more than the average.
  • Bioenergy, renewable natural gas and imported hydrogen are not modeled.
  • Green hydrogen is counted conservatively: a 51% efficiency measured in Quebec, compression and fueling station included (Quebec Ministère des Transports, 2024), replacing natural gas, the lowest-emitting fuel. Conversion into synthetic fuels is not counted: with it, hydrogen would avoid even fewer GHGs.
Scenario data (CSV)

Annual series of the scenario shown, separated by semicolons, for expert review.

Inspired by the En-ROADS simulator from Climate Interactive.

To understand how Hydro-Québec forecasts demand and plans its supply and its grid: Planning tomorrow’s energy.

Generating facilities

Scenario charts

Turn the device sideways to widen the chart.